via email from sfchronicle

State legislation updates: New California laws takes aim at injustices in water rights system and bring big changes for campsite reservations. More: California voters will now choose “keep the law” or “overturn the law” when voting on referendums. Gov. Newsom signs treatment-focused bills in response to fentanyl crisis, but vetoes others. Also vetoed are a layoff notice bill that would have protected contract workers, and one to pay low-income jurors $100 a day.

By Reina Tello : capitolweekly – excerpt

OPINION – Last week, AB 1633 passed the State Senate by a single vote despite a strong campaign by environmental justice advocates to stop the bill. Unless vetoed by the Governor, this bill will tip the scales in favor of powerful development and industry interests and against everyday Californians and vulnerable communities.

AB 1633 undermines the core purposes of CEQA in fundamental ways. First, it allows developers to sue a city if they disagree with the city’s decisions about environmental review for housing projects—and to recover their attorneys’ fees if they prevail in the suit. For example, a developer could sue a city for requiring an Environmental Impact Report when the developer claims the project is exempt from CEQA. Critically, such lawsuits can be filed before the city acts to approve or deny the project, and even before the public has had a meaningful opportunity to comment on its effect. Worse yet, the mere threat of these lawsuits is likely to cause cities to forego necessary environmental analysis, even for projects proposed in communities suffering from long-term pollution…

Second, the bill effectively bars community groups from recovering their attorneys’ fees in CEQA suits challenging housing even when meeting the stringent requirements for private attorneys general after a court rules in their favor on the merits. This new rule means that only monied interests can sue to enforce CEQA; environmental justice groups, who depend on attorneys taking cases on a contingent basis, cannot. This change is unprecedented and will rob vulnerable communities of their most effective tool for safeguarding the public health and safety.…(more)

We need to call the Governor’s office on AB 1633. Any bill that barely passed in the Senate must have a lot of public opposition. We need to magnify that opposition by shaming the Sacramento politicians who are engaged in reducing our rights to question every aspect of state decisions. There is nothing more dangerous to our society than a government that silences its people. California officials can hardly make a case against oppressive behavior in other states when our state government is taking repressive actions against us. They are playing a dangerous game with our country and putting the Democratic Party at risk of losing more votes in the House and Senate as more California voters shift their alliance to a non-party status. Some links to reps: https://discoveryink.wordpress.com/ca-legislative-process/

We need to contact our representatives in Washington to convince them to make the case for us as well. Start with the candidates for the Senate seat. We need their support to stop this slide into autocracy if they want to continue to control the Senate and take back the House. All this is not happening in a vacuum. The nation is watching. In California: Find your Senator / Find your House Representative

By John King : sfchronicle – excerpt

Most Bay Area residents only know Mountain House by what they glimpse when descending Altamont Pass into the San Joaquin Valley: row after row of close-packed houses stretching north from Interstate 205.

They haven’t visited the large orderly neighborhoods with blocks of faux-historic houses clustered around community parks and elementary schools, or the old-fashioned town hall and library next to, what else, Central Community Park. They almost certainly don’t recall the rhetoric when Mountain House was conceived decades ago — assurances that this would blossom as a self-contained place with housing and jobs in holistic harmony…

But if such rosy visions sound familiar, here’s why: They’re uncannily similar to the rhetoric being used for a proposed “new city” in Solano County by California Forever, a company that is backed by some of Silicon Valley’s wealthiest investors…

“When you lay these plans out, you have to remember you’re in the permission-seeking business,” said Gerry Kamilos, the developer of Mountain House’s College Park neighborhood. “Economic cycles, political cycles, cultural changes — they all affect how the plan evolves.”… (more)

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

Board members asked for a modest delay to consider the mayor’s amendments to a complex housing bill. The Chron talks of “Nimbys.”

I should know better than to take seriously any analysis of the city’s housing crisis coming from the Office of State Sen. Scott Wiener and SPUR, and I would rather just ignore this Chronicle oped, which is headlined “Why SF NIMBYs are about to lose all their power to stop housing.”

Fact: SF Nimbys, such as they exist, are not stopping housing right now; the Federal Reserve and the preferences of speculative capital are. The city has approved tens of thousands of housing units that could break ground today, no Nimby opposition, no frivolous lawsuits … they have building permits.

But there’s not enough return on investment to make those units profitable, which is what developers care about.

There are also thousands of empty units so the market is not clamoring for more of the same overpriced, little units in the sky, with or without views.

Back to the point:

Annie Fryman, a former Wiener staffer who now works at SPUR, characterizes a hearing on Mayor London Breed’s recent housing bill as “dry policy” that was “sensationalized.”…

I watched every minute of the hearing. Her account is just wrong.

The supervisors weren’t “posturing.” They were doing what we elected them to do: Evaluating a piece of legislation that may have sounded “dry” but will actually have a significant impact on the local housing market—and is strongly opposed not by Nimbys (I didn’t see a single person who could be identified by that term at the hearing) but by every single tenant group in town and the broad Race and Equity in All Planning coalition…

Nobody from the Mayor’s Office showed up. A Planning Department staffer had no answers for many of the questions—but he did present a long list of new amendments that the supes hadn’t seen…

The reason I bother with this is because it’s important. As I predicted, the entirely reasonable response of the supes to this legislation is going to be a tool of the right-wing folks like Elon Musk and Michael Moritz who want to destroy progressive power in San Francisco.

They are using classic political strategies developed by the right over the years: Pick on one politician (it used to be Chesa Boudin, now it’s Dean Preston), and find one or two complex issues (crime, housing), simplify them to slogans (“public safety, Nimby”) and use that as a wedge to get people who are friendly to the billionaires into power.

There’s a reason that the neoliberal policies that have created the worse economic inequality in US history have succeeded. The people who profit from those policies have worked the Big Lies, and the news media has gone along.

And now, here we go again. …(more)